Marketing Firm

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg
Showing posts with label failed brands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label failed brands. Show all posts

Sunday, 22 January 2006

Bajaj Chetak (1972-2005) :RIP

Posted on 20:52 by Unknown
Brand : Bajaj Chetak
Company : Bajaj Auto Ltd

The brand which ruled the Indian roads have been laid to rest. Bajaj has officially stopped the production of Bajaj Chetak from December 2005. The stocks will last may be upto March 2006. The company says that the product no longer have any relevance to the customer. To quote Rajiv bajaj " Any one who clings to the past is a failure".
I owned a Chetak: a gift from my father for having secured admission to MBA program. It was in the year 1996. Later I exchanged it for a bike in 2001. Still Chetak lingers in me ( or rather haunts me) in the form of " Back Pain".
The brand which was launched in 1972 virtually owned the two wheeler segment. If reports are to be believed, Chetak was an unavoidable dowry in 1970's and 80's. It had a waiting period of more than 10 years ( can you believe it ? ) and now here I am after 34 years, writing the epitaph of this brand.
The brand which was named after the legendary stallion of the Rajput king Maharana Pratap, was known for the reliability and sturdiness. The brand thrived during the license raj with virtually no competition. It was during 1990-91 that the brand began the journey to the end.
Bajaj Chetak had a huge brand equity . The brand had the persona of a " work horse". With reasonable price and the low maintenance cost made this product a huge hit among the middle class Indians.
Promoted along the base line " Hamara Bajaj", this was the Indian Family vehicle - a position now owned by Maruthi 800.
But then How can a brand that was so popular and successful fail?
Frankly, I am not sure. But here is what I think about this brand...
The primary reason is that the Brand forgot the customers. Another case of Marketing Myopia. The company failed to understand the changing perception of the customers towards scooters. Rather than looking at the customers, the company focused on influencing Government to block the opening up of economy. Bajaj never did anything with the product. For 40 years Chetak had the same look, same quality and style.
During the mid nineties the company realised lately that the segment has shifted to motorcycles. Scooters were no longer the option. But did the company made a mistake in discarding the scooter segment ? Looking at the way the share prices are going, the market thinks that Bajaj Auto made the right decision. But I think that they made a mistake in leaving the scooter segment completely. Contrary to expectation, the scooter segment has not died. It has only changed.
Chetak lost its identity some where during the nineties. What should be the future of the brand : no body knew. It was only in 2004 that company made any change in Chetak. In 1994 Bajaj introduced Classic another scooter with same style as Chetak, but failed.
Bajaj never was serious about product development. The R&D spent for a long time was a miniscule 1%. The average cycle time for the new product development was 4-5 years compared to 2-3 years of Japanese competitors.
Even after the opening up of economy, the scooter segment did not witness much competition.
The players like Vespa did not had much of success in this segment. Kinetic Honda managed to carve a niche with its gearless scooters. Another segment which was growing was the scooterette segment which was dominated by TVS scooty.
Bajaj never seriously looked at customer perception about Chetak. The product had serious problems like starting trouble and riding comfort. The " Tilting the chetak to the side for starting " was a common joke. Did the company do anything for that ? no
There was nothing wrong with the Promotion. " Hamara Bajaj " and " No one can beat a Bajaj " were famous base lines. There was nothing wrong with distribution and the pricing was very reasonable. The major problem was in the first P : Product.
So without addressing any problems regarding the product , can you expect the customer to buy the product ?
Bajaj was never a leader in technology ( now they are !!!). They never bothered to and paid the price . Had Chetak pioneered Electric start, had it provided more riding comfort, it could have survived.
Somebody have just beat the Bajaj........ the customer!
Read More
Posted in automobile brands, Bajaj, branding, failed brands, marketing myopia | No comments

Thursday, 12 January 2006

Yezdi (1961-1995) : RIP

Posted on 20:28 by Unknown


Brand: Yezdi
Company: Ideal Jawa India Ltd

A brand that was once the heartthrob of Indian urban Youth is now resting in peace...

A case of marketing myopia...

I am not sure why I chose this brand , may be because of nostalgia. During my school days me and my brother used to argue as to whether Yezdi or Bullet is the best.

This bike was manufactured by Ideal Jawa Ltd with technical collaboration with Jawa of Czechoslovakia. Ideal Jawa started its operations in 1960 .Yezdi ( that time Jawa ) was in Indian roads from 1961. During 1960's Indian roads were ruled by scooters. Bikes were not at all popular due to mechanical issues and low mileage.

During that period , there were only three serious players in the Indian motorcycles market. Bullet, Rajdoot and Ideal Jawa. Rajdoot was popular in rural areas because of sturdy suspension. Bullet and Jawa were popular in the urban market.
Yezdi was targeting the youth with the positioning of " Forever Bike Forever Value" . Since it was a seller's market, what ever that was produced were lapped up by Indian consumers.

1980's saw a sea change in the Indian two wheeler market. Japanese technology entered the Indian market through joint ventures. The market saw lot of new 100 cc bikes which were more fuel efficient and easy to ride.
Ideal Jawa was having a blind eye. It refused to accept the realities. When the consumer attitudes changed, Jawa refused to change . Customers wanted Bikes that offered mileage, style and comfort. Japanese bikes provided all that. This period also showed the shift of Indian consumers from scooters to motorcycles.
Yezdi had serious mechanical issues, especially the starting trouble. One had to pump about 20 times to get that machine started. It had no chance before the peppy new generation Japanese bikes.
Yezdi realised this late and came out with some design changes and new launches like Roadking which had a new styling. But it was too late.
Failing market and labour problems took its toll on Ideal Jawa . Yezdi was laid to rest in 1995. Had Yezdi changed its products in tune with the customer needs, we would have seen a lot of this bike on Indian roads. but alas ....
Once an Icon, Yezdi has now faded in to the annals of history.
Read More
Posted in automobile brands, branding, failed brands, marketing myopia | No comments

Wednesday, 28 December 2005

Old spice : Death of an Icon?

Posted on 22:16 by Unknown


Brand : Old Spice
Company : Menzes cosmetics
Agency : Percept

This brand which is originally owned by P&G is a sad story of an Icon killed by apathy. Old spice is an international brand launched in India in 1969.
The first Old Spice product was called Early American Old Spice for women . It was introduced in 1937. In 1938, Old Spice for men were launched. Old Spice was manufactured by Shulton Co owned by William Schultz. Schultz developed Old Spice along the Colonial theme. Hence the nautical theme was chosen and Sailing ship especially Colonial Sailing ship was used the trademark. The Original ships that were used was Grand Turk and Friendship.

In 1990 P&G purchased the Brand from Shulton. The old ship was replaced by Sail boat/ Yatch in 1992.

In India from 1937 to 1993, the Old Spice was manufactured and marketed by Menzes Cosmetics Goa. Then P&G took over the brand and in 2001 again the brand was given back to Menzes cosmetics. In between the brand was licensed to Marico Industries but later the agreement was terminated.

Old Spice was generic name for After shaves in India. The cool Cologne and Lime fragrance was a run away success and the trade mark of the ship was unique. I still remember in 1990's trying desperately to find out collectible like lockets/ keychains .

Old Spice was positioned as a masculine brand with the baseline " mark of a man'. The advertisement was catchy with international models and thrilling themes.

But then something happened. The brand was put in the back burner. There was no marketing activity about the brand. No ads, No product launches, slowly the brand faded out of memory. Since there is no activity, the growth of the brand stopped and death of an Icon happened.

Still there are no successful Aftershave brands in Indian Market that can command the status of Old Spice of yester years. Old Spice had the potential to be an Icon. The brand was well known, the quality was good and there was some thing special about Old Spice and the Sail ship.

Now since the brand is back with the company that has launched it, let us hope that the brand revives itself. The void is still there. Neither Axe nor Gillette has the legacy of Old Spice.

Read More
Posted in branding, failed brands, FMCG, iconic brand, marketing myopia, personal care | No comments

Tuesday, 13 December 2005

Liril : Bring back the Liril girl

Posted on 20:14 by Unknown

Brand : Liril

Company : HLL

Agency : Lowe

If you are looking for a case of an iconic Brand that is going to be killed by poor marketing strategy , look no further, here is Liril for you.

Launched in 1975, the year I was born, this is a brand that built a segment or should I say category for it self in the Indian market. The brand is also the testimony to the genius of India's Ad man Alyque Padamsee. This is what he says about the Liril Brand

The name Liril had been registered by Hindustan Lever from a list sent to them by Unilever in London. Levers were very keen that the soap have striations, wiggly stripes of different colours running across the tablet. I recommended the tablet be blue - because waterfall is blue with white striations. Hindustan Lever was very excited and produced 1,000 tablets for testing.
At this point Derk Wooller, the Marketing Controller of Hindustan Lever's soaps division, stepped in and suggested we add the freshness of lime to our story. He felt that though the waterfall had tremendous emotional appeal, Liril needed a rational ingredient to clinch the deal. I was not averse to this but suggested that we do an `As marketed' test: Blue Liril versus Green Liril with limes. I was wrong and Wooller was right. The rest is history."
Alyque Padamsee in his book A Double Life.

The brand was a run away success and the Liril girl became the talk of the town. The brand has


beenconsistentt with its communication and the effective use of brand imagery. Further on brand imagery can be found in this article , visit http://www.blonnet.com/catalyst/2004/09/23/stories/2004092300100200.htm

Liril was positioned on the freshness platform right from its birth. The girl and the waterfall with the unique jingle ensured that the freshness is experienced by the audience. Liril can be called as an experiential brand and the communication perfectly supported that.

Liril did not change its positioning for 25 years although the models changed, the brand communication was consistent. Then some nut in the company or the agency thought that they should change the communication that worked so effectively. The rest as I say it " Liril became history".

Liril has changed the imagery and the jingle in the name of freshness .The new jingle or the ad never had that freshness. That is why Liril had to change the Ads twice with in a span of five years. Mind you Liril never changed its imagery or the Jingle for 25 years...

Reports say that Liril had to change because of its stagnant marketshare. I think there are reasons for declining market share which can be that the brand failed to understand the changing consumer expectations. There was a flurry of brand launches during the past 10 years and Liril was sleeping all the time " may be resting on the laurels" . It should have hold on its positioning of ' freshness " not by changing its communication but by communicating more, developing variants, bringing in flanking brands or variants and thus owning the whole segment for itself.

But it never happened , Liril tried to introduce the Icy mint variant very late and that too with a different jingle and imagery. We knew that the Old Liril had died. HLL could have used the same communication strategy . Then came the horrible experiment of Orange Liril with a stupid Jingle OOFYUMMA.... excuse me what the hell is that?

The product failed. Then came the new campaign involving a couple and a new jingle " La-ira -ela", the ad was good but where is liril ?

Like Onida , Liril has to come back with the old imagery and old jingle that made liril what it Is ( or WAS?) [ It is a prediction].

When it does that consumers will take the brand to their heart .

Laaaaa lalalala laaa ...................

Read More
Posted in branding, failed brands, FMCG, HLL, marketing myopia, personal care, soap brands | No comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Coca-Cola : Thanda nahin hai?
    Brand : Coke Agency: McCann Baseline : Piyo sar Utha Ke Well ........ Marketers some times behaves like fools !!!!!! Why the hell one should...
  • Polo : Mint With A Hole
    Brand : Polo Company : Nestle Agency : Lowe Polo is the market leader in the mint candy category in India. This is a brand that has created ...
  • Bajaj avenger- Feel Like God
    Brand : Bajaj Avenger Company- Bajaj Auto Ltd Agency : Lowe Brand Analysis Count : 1 Bajaj Avenger was launched in 2005. The brand was the s...
  • Fair & Lovely : Chand ka Tukda
    Brand : Fair & Lovely Company : HLL Agency: Lowe Fair & Lovely ( FAL) is the brand that revolutionized the Indian Skin care industry...
  • Titan watches : What is your style ?
    Brand : Titan Company : TATA Agency: O&M Indian Watch industry is estimated to be around 1600 crores and Titan is riding on top of it wi...
  • Raymonds: The complete Man :A complete campaign
    Raymonds : Expressions : A Complete man Headline: Leadership comes naturally to those who do not stand on ceremony. Subhead: Presenting Exp...
  • Colgate Dental Cream : ye hai hamari suraksha chakra
    Brand : Colgate Dental Cream Agency : Rediffusion DYR Colgate has been ruling the Rs 2200 crore oral care segment for long with a market sha...
  • A revolutionary product: Killed by poor advertising
    Brand : Tata Indicom True paid Baseline : Do more live more The product from tata indicom prepaid is revolutionary since it "talks...
  • touching the customer
    Are you serious about customer service? Well then answer the following questions 1. How do you communicate to the customers? 2. Who is commu...
  • Surf Excel : Dirt Is Good:So Is The Idea
    Brand : Surf excel Agency : Lowe Baseline : Dag Ache hain " Dirt is good" Brand Count : 3 Surf has been in the market for a long t...

Categories

  • absurdism in advertising
  • Air Deccan
  • automobile brands
  • Bajaj
  • beverages
  • branding
  • branding commodity
  • celebrity endorsement
  • cement brands
  • Colgate
  • consumer durable brands
  • corporate brand
  • Detergent brands
  • Dettol
  • Diversification
  • failed brands
  • FMCG
  • FMHG
  • Food brands
  • Heritage Brand
  • HLL
  • Horlicks
  • iconic brand
  • Indica
  • Innerwear
  • ITC
  • John Players
  • Jyothi Lab
  • Maggi
  • marketing myopia
  • mobiles
  • Nestle
  • onida
  • Parle
  • personal care
  • proctor and gamble
  • Product life cycle
  • readymade brands
  • Reckitt Benkiser
  • shampoo
  • smcg
  • Snack Foods
  • soap brands
  • stationary
  • Tata
  • textiles
  • Titan
  • Toothpaste
  • Toyota
  • Ujala
  • writing instrument

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2006 (22)
    • ▼  February (2)
      • Polo : Mint With A Hole
      • Fair & Lovely : Chand ka Tukda
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2005 (33)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (13)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile